Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Phillip Charleston v. William Lothrop, et al
as 22-16918
Petitioner / Appellant:
PHILLIP T. CHARLESTON, named Phillip T Charleston - El
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM W. LOTHROP, Warden and RUSSELL HEISNER, Warden, FCI-Tucson
Smith v. Lothrop et al
as 2:2022cv01324
Plaintiff:
Adam Smith
Defendant:
William W Lothrop, Unknown Salisbury, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Charleston v. Lothrop
as 2:2021cv01835
Petitioner:
Phillip T Charleston
Respondent:
William W Lothrop and Russell Heisner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Elliott v. Lothrop
as 2:2021cv01480
Petitioner:
Mark W Elliott
Respondent:
William W Lothrop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Urena-Villa v. Lothrop
as 2:2021cv00287
Respondent:
William W Lothrop
Petitioner:
Emilio Urena-Villa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sage v. Lothrop
as 1:2020cv01985
Petitioner:
Chris Darrell Joseph Sage
Respondent:
Warden william W. lothrop and William W. Lothrop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Vilaychith Khouanmany v. Paul Penzone, et al
as 20-16594
Defendant / Appellee:
P. TORRES, Secretary, FPC-Phoenix, COPELAND, Ms., Case Manager, FPC-Phoenix, PAUL PENZONE, Sheriff of Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Jail Commander, Estrella Jail and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VILAYCHITH KHOUANMANY
Phillip Charleston v. William Lothrop
as 20-16367
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM W. LOTHROP, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
PHILLIP T. CHARLESTON, named Phillip T Charleston - El
Vilaychith Khouanmany v. Paul Penzone, et al
as 20-15999
Defendant / Appellee:
P. TORRES, Secretary, FPC-Phoenix, COPELAND, Ms., Case Manager, FPC-Phoenix, PAUL PENZONE, Sheriff of Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Jail Commander, Estrella Jail and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VILAYCHITH KHOUANMANY
Johnson v. Lothrop
as 2:2020cv00908
Respondent:
William W Lothrop
Petitioner:
Antonyo Dewayne Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
