Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Austin et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 5:2014cv00391
Plaintiff:
Arthur Austin , Charles Burkes , Ethel Caldwell and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation , Glaxosmithkline LLC , Aryan Kadivar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams-Wallace et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv06816
Plaintiff:
Betty Williams-Wallace and George Wallace
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wallace et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp20559
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy International Limited , DePuy, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
William Wallace and Lizandra Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alkurd et al v. Cavalier Home Builders, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv03694
Plaintiff:
Mohammad R. Alkurd, Natasha Ambo, Jessica Thornley and others
Defendant:
Cavalier Home Builders, LLC, Cavalier Homes, Inc., North American Catastrophe Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
COBB et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv05095
Plaintiff:
DONNA F. COBB , GARY COOPER , JAMES FRANK and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Alfonso et al
as 2:2009xc07938
Plaintiff:
Vernon E. Alfonso, Mohammad R. Alkurd, Natasha Ambo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WALLACE v. GARLOCK, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv65880
Plaintiff:
RICHARD WILLIAM WALLACE and RICHARD WILLIAM WALLACE
Defendant:
GARLOCK, INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., GENERAL ELECTRIC CO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
TOWE v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv75671
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WALLACE TOWE
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
