Cases 1 - 9 of 9
RODRIGUEZ v. DIOCESE OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2024cv03001
Plaintiff:
JULIE RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
DIOCESE OF CAMDEN, SAINT JOSEPH REGIONAL SCHOOL, WILLIAM WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
WATSON et al v. SAVITSKI et al
as 2:2020cv00094
Defendant:
SAV EXPRESS, INC. and ALIAKSANDR SAVITSKI
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WATSON and TONYA WATSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WATSON et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv04307
Plaintiff:
JAMAL WATSON , MARY WATSON and WILLIAM WATSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT , JEREMY OLESIK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Janet Watson, et al v. Haverford Township Police Dep, et al
as 12-2709
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JANET WATSON and WILLIAM WATSON, h/w
Defendant - Appellant:
HARVEY PIKE and STEVEN GILL
Defendant - Appellee:
HAVERFORD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, TOWNSHIP OF HAVERFORD, CARMEN D. PETTINE and others
HOLMES v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67260
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WATSON HOLMES
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WATSON et al v. HAVERFORD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2010cv06731
Plaintiff:
JANET WATSON and WILLIAM WATSON
Defendant:
HAVERFORD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, THE TOWNSHIP OF HAVERFORD, CARMEN D. PETTINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATSON et al v. ICON INFORMATION CONSULTANTS LP et al
as 1:2010cv03380
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WATSON and ROBERT TOTH
Defendant:
ICON INFORMATION CONSULTANTS LP, PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC & GAS, AEROTEK ENERGY SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
