Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Hines v. Wise et al
as 1:2016cv00461
Plaintiff:
Thomas Curtis Hines
Defendant:
Justice Wise, Justice Shaw, Justice Main and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Dillard et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00518
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Ray, Jr.
Defendant:
Cynthia Dillard, Nancy McCreary, William Wynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Cochran et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00241
Plaintiff:
Terry Wayne Anderson
Defendant:
Sandra Cochran, Eddie Cook, William Wynne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taite v. Alabama President Pro Tempore et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2013cv00291
Plaintiff:
Marcus Orlando Taite
Defendant:
Alabama President Pro Tempore, William Wynn, Robert Oaks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Foster v. Dillard et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00288
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lee Foster
Defendant:
Cynthia Dillard, William Wynn and Alabama Board of Pardons & Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vinson v. Dillard et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00282
Plaintiff:
Willie L.B. Vinson
Defendant:
Cynthia Dillard, Alabama Board of Pardons & Paroles, William Wynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatcher v. Wynne et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00226
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lee Hatcher
Defendant:
William Wynne, Robert Longshore, Cliff Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herrod v. Wynn et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2009cv00203
Plaintiff:
McArthur Herrod
Defendant:
William Wynn, Velinda Weatherly and Steve McGill
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pope v. McGill et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2009cv00106
Plaintiff:
Willie Pope
Defendant:
Steve McGill, William Wynn and Velinda Weatherly
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Henley v. McGriff et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2009cv00055
Plaintiff:
Richard Henley
Defendant:
Seven McGriff, William Wynn and Velinda Weatherly
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
