Cases 31 - 40 of 4,399
Williams #201665 v. LaRou et al
as 1:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Desmond A. Williams #201665
Defendant:
Madison LaRou, Unknown Johnson, Unknown Hawkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strong v. Teamsters, Local Union No. 299 et al
as 2:2024cv10659
Plaintiff:
William Strong
Defendant:
Local 299, International Brotherhood of Teamsters and Syncreon North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Williams v. Continental Aktiengesellschaft et al
as 2:2024cv10632
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Williams
Defendant:
Continental Aktiengesellschaft, Continental Tire the Americas, LLC, Compagne Generale Des Etablissements Michelin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Bohnard v. Nagy
as 1:2024cv00261
Petitioner:
Dennis William Bohnard
Respondent:
Noah Nagy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Pouncy v. Federspiel et al
as 2:2024cv10554
Plaintiff:
Omar Rashad Pouncy
Defendant:
William L. Federspiel, Miguel Gomez, Ebony Rasco and others
Robinson #462832 v. Macauley et al
as 1:2024cv00210
Petitioner:
Isaiah Robinson #462832
Respondent:
Matt Macauley, William Zeerip, Heidi Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Fair et al
as 2:2024cv10495
Plaintiff:
Deandre Keith Williams
Defendant:
Officer Matthew Fair, Officer Hussein Abdallah, Matthew Fair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Bolen et al
as 2:2024cv10474
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Maverick Bolen, David Patterson, Caroline Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Brown v. Peckham, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
Desirae Brown
Defendant:
Peckham, Inc. and Byron Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
