Cases 41 - 50 of 229
Griffin v. Microphone Men of the Investigation et al
as 1:2019cv11778
Defendant:
City Hall LA, Police Department, Microphone Men of the Investigation and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Rogers Griffin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Siewe v. Saul
as 1:2019cv11733
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Willy Siewe
Interested Party:
Social Security Administation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Robinson v. Spaulding
as 1:2019cv11393
Respondent:
Stephen Spaulding
Petitioner:
Willie Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv11095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDonald v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00494
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC, Atrium Medical Corporation and Getinge AB
Plaintiff:
Willie A. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mendiola v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv10947
Defendant:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., Fresenius USA Marketing, Inc, Fresenius USA, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Willis Mendiola
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramos et al v. Patrick K. Willis Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv10217
Defendant:
JMAC Recovery, American Recovery Service, Inc., Patrick K. Willis Company, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Ramos and Felix Varela
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Nease v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00700
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., Ethicon, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Nease
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abulzahab et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv12658
Plaintiff:
Alie Soufan, Roy Gendron, Derek Thomas and others
Defendant:
Rasier, LLC, Nelson Chai, Dara Khosrowshahi and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Riddick v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2018cv12482
Plaintiff:
Willie Riddick
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
