Cases 51 - 60 of 2,431
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Smith v. Washington et al
as 2:2023cv12903
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Lewis Smith
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Willis Chapman, Kristopher Steece and others
Cooper v. Willis et al
as 2:2023cv03753
Plaintiff:
Kitt Channing Cooper, Jr.
Defendant:
Wayne Willis, Jeannie E Willis and Jason Willis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Tuttle v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03711
Plaintiff:
Willis Tuttle
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Willis v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03707
Plaintiff:
Michael J Willis
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Alfred Johnson, Sr. v. Annette Chambers-Smith, et al
as 23-3891
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALFRED A. JOHNSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, Director, DEVIN HOOVER, Inspector, UNIT MANAGER WILLIS and others
Downs et al v. Smith, IV et al
as 1:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
William Owen Downs, Willie Downs Livestock and Willie Downs Livestock, Inc.
Defendant:
Bert Smith, IV and Rowdy Livestock, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Powell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
Earl Willis Powell, III
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Willis v. Mapleside Farms et al.
as 1:2023cv01995
Plaintiff:
Irene Willis
Defendant:
Mapleside Farms, The Blue Apple, John Does 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
