Cases 11 - 20 of 179
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Young v. Arizona, State of, et al
as 2:2022cv01368
Plaintiff:
Brittian Willie Young and Open Entry Services
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, Arizona Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Timmons v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv00804
Plaintiff:
Willie James Timmons, Jr.
Defendant:
David Shinn, Paul Penzone, Dori Littler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kirby et al v. Shinn et al
as 4:2021cv00360
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Kirby, Michael Davison, Jeremy Bertrand and others
Defendant:
David Shinn, Unknown Pacheco, Unknown Schwestack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2021cv01365
Plaintiff:
Willie De Andre Miller
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Miller v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2021cv00902
Plaintiff:
Willie D Miller
Defendant:
Bret A Draughn and Phoenix, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timmons v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv00668
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Willie James Timmons, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
