Cases 1 - 10 of 11
FAIR v. USA
as 1:2023cv00972
Petitioner:
RONNIE WILTON FAIR
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Chicago Title Company, LLC v. Wilton Re Services, Inc.-Aegon et al
as 3:2022cv00566
Plaintiff:
Chicago Title Company, LLC
Defendant:
Wilton Re Services, Inc.-Aegon and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
FAIR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2021cv00435
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
RONNIE WILTON FAIR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FAIR v. USA
as 1:2017cv00930
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
RONNIE WILTON FAIR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Moore, et al v. Seterus, Inc., et al
as 4:2016cv00293
Plaintiff:
Gwenda G. Moore and R. Wilton Moore
Defendant:
Seterus, Inc. , Federal National Mortgage Association , The Bank of New York Mellon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00693
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Vandermeer v. M/V Charazz, et al.
as 4:2015cv00153
Plaintiff:
Albert G. Vandermeer
Defendant:
M/V Charazz, Grand Slam Yacht & Boat Sales, LLC , James Allen Hinds and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Bryant v. The City Of Greenville, North Carolina et al
as 4:2010cv00124
Plaintiff:
Charles Abraham Bryant
Defendant:
The City Of Greenville, North Carolina, Michael George, Steven Cottingham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kendall v. US Parole Commission et al
as 5:2008hc02005
Petitioner:
Morris Wilton Kendall
Respondent:
US Parole Commission and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
