Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Whittenberger v. LaVoie et al
as 2:2023cv01589
Plaintiff:
Leroy R Whittenberger
Defendant:
Daniel LaVoie, Barry Daughtry, Melissa McFarlane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leroy R. Whittenberger v. Daniel Winkleski, et al
as 23-3106
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEROY R. WHITTENBERGER
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL WINKLESKI, ROSLYN HUNEKE, TAMMY STURMNESS and others
Whittenberger, Leroy v. Winkleski, Daniel et al
as 3:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Leroy R. Whittenberger
Defendant:
Daniel Winkleski, Roslyn Huneke, Tammy Sturmness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews, Walter et al v. Winkleski, Daniel et al
as 3:2022cv00708
Plaintiff:
Laurie Matthews
Not Yet Classified:
Walter Matthews
Defendant:
Daniel Winkleski and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mark, Jonathon v. Winkleski et al
as 3:2022cv00667
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Mark
Defendant:
Mr. Winkleski, Mr. Cahak, Lt. Haas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Booker Shipp v. Kenneth Lobenstein, et al
as 22-2260
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BOOKER T. SHIPP
Defendant / Appellee:
KENNETH LOBENSTEIN and DANIEL WINKLESKI
Kelly Duke v. Dan Winkleski
as 22-1605
Petitioner / Appellant:
KELLY DUKE
Respondent / Appellee:
DAN WINKLESKI, Warden
Johnnies, Timothy v. Winkleski et al
as 3:2022cv00139
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. Johnnies
Defendant:
Warden Winkleski, Timothy Thomas, Brian Cahak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Page, Emmanuel v. Inmate Call Solutions et al
as 3:2021cv00761
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Page
Defendant:
Inmate Call Solutions, Jospeh M. Stafford, CFO Josh Saino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith, Tyrone v. Carr, Kevin et al
as 3:2021cv00656
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Davis Smith
Defendant:
Kevin A. Carr and Daniel Winkleski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
