Cases 1 - 10 of 32
JACKSON-BEY v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
HANEEF SHAKE EL JACKSON-BEY
Defendant:
S. KALLIS, UNKNOWN NAMED OFFICER, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR (A.R.C.), A. FRENCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
WINTERS BEY v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2023cv00744
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL WINTERS BEY
Defendant:
MARK SEVIER, FITCH, FRENCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REYNOLDS v. WINTER et al
as 1:2022cv01701
Plaintiff:
KEVIN RICHARD REYNOLDS
Defendant:
ZACHARY R. WINTER and UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
WINTER v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv03054
Plaintiff:
WESLEY ALAN WINTER, II
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SMITH v. GEO GROUP INC et al
as 1:2021cv02856
Plaintiff:
TROY L. SMITH
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC, WEXFORD OF INDIANA LLC, CENTURION MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2021cv00375
Defendant:
RYAN DIENHART, KEITH CUTLIFF, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
VETRIA R. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUIZ v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00246
Defendant:
HANNAH WINNINGHAM, ELLIOT, TERRY and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO RUIZ, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. DIENHART et al
as 1:2020cv03110
Defendant:
K. CUTCLIFF, PHIL BOWERS, MARION COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS AGENCY and others
Plaintiff:
EZEKIEL I. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WINTERS v. ANDONSON et al
as 1:2020cv00728
Defendant:
ANDONSON and SKUTTER
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL WINTERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WINTERS v. DOMBKOWSKI et al
as 1:2019cv04915
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL A. WINTERS
Defendant:
DOMBKOWSKI, HIMES, LONG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
