Cases 1 - 10 of 31
MADISON v. BERRY et al
as 5:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
TERRELL MADISON
Defendant:
WARDEN WALTER BERRY, MR CLARK, MR GARDENER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wade et al v. Morgan et al
as 3:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Betty Wade and David Jacob Henegar
Defendant:
Keambriah Morgan, Jessica Blount, Tamara Grier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CASLEBERRY v. EKWINIFE et al
as 5:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
LAMAR DESHAWN CASLEBERRY
Defendant:
DOCTOR DAVID EKWINIFE, WARDEN WALTER BERRY, DEPUTY WARDEN CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. WILLAMSON et al
as 5:2021cv00453
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ADDARRYL JONES and TUPAC DAVID SHAKUR
Defendant:
TERRANCE DENNIS, KELSIE WILLIAMSON, WARDEN BERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMPBELL v. BERRY et al
as 5:2021cv00445
Plaintiff:
DAVID LANE CAMPBELL
Defendant:
WARDEN WALTER BERRY, ERIC MARTIN, REGINA WOMBLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WELLS v. BERRY et al
as 5:2021cv00407
Plaintiff:
TYRECQUISS SHAEWAUN WELLS
Defendant:
WARDEN WALTER BERRY, DEPUTY WARDEN ERIC MARTIN, WARDEN REGINA WOMBLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAYTON v. EDWARD et al
as 5:2021cv00081
Defendant:
CO2 FLOYD EDWARD, CO2 ERIKA SHINHOLSTER, REGENIA WOMBLE and others
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Womble v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2019cv01744
Plaintiff:
Donetta Womble
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ford v. Womble
as 1:2018cv02670
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lilrod Ford
Defendant:
Genean M. Womble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUSHIN v. FILBURN et al
as 1:2018cv00030
Plaintiff:
RONALD EARLE RUSHIN
Defendant:
FILBURN, McGrew, TREBLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
