Cases 21 - 30 of 267
Garza et al v. Woods
as 2:2022cv01310
Plaintiff:
Jessica Garza and Kevin Terrell
Defendant:
Rob Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nance #168108 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv01302
Plaintiff:
Keith Preston Nance
Defendant:
David Shinn, Kenneth Herman, Allen Miser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Wood et al
as 3:2022cv08109
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Steve Wood, Jr., Diana Wood, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Wood v. Apria Healthcare Group LLC
as 2:2022cv01030
Plaintiff:
Laraine Wood
Defendant:
Apria Healthcare Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Ibn-Woods #144838 v. Shinn, et al
as 2:2022cv00013
Plaintiff:
Mujahid Abdul-Malik Shabazz Ibn-Woods
Defendant:
David Shinn, Unknown Henry, Unknown Cabrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cocreham v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2021cv02044
Plaintiff:
Lillian Cocreham
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Jeri Williams, Cody Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Vitasek v. Wood et al
as 2:2021cv01836
Plaintiff:
Arthur Leon Vitasek
Defendant:
Amy M Wood and Randall M Howe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Shinn et al
as 4:2021cv00416
Plaintiff:
John Leo Davis
Defendant:
David Shinn, Unknown Valenzuela, Carlos Pentecost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maguire v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv01725
Petitioner:
Wood Anthony Maguire
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cocreham v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2021cv01670
Plaintiff:
Lillian Cocreham
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Jeri Williams, Cody Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
