Cases 41 - 50 of 68
Kurtis M. Bailey v. Bernzomatic et al
as 1:2016cv07548
Plaintiff:
Kurtis M. Bailey
Defendant:
Bernzomatic, Worthington Cylinder Corporation , Worthington Industries Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kurtis M. Bailey v. Bernzomatic et al
as 2:2016cv01665
Plaintiff:
Kurtis M. Bailey
Defendant:
Bernzomatic, Does, Irwin Industrial Tool Company and others
Jason Logan Abell v. Worthington Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv08427
Plaintiff:
Jason Logan Abell
Defendant:
Bernzomatic Inc., Does, Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and others
Maples et al v. Ferrellgas Partners, L. P. et al
as 5:2015cv00085
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Maples and Billy Doswell
Defendant:
Ferrellgas Partners, L. P., Ferrellgas, L. P., Worthington Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bradley Englebrick v. Worthington Industries, Inc.
as 13-56780
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRADLEY ENGLEBRICK and ROXANNE HERNANDEZ
Defendant - Appellant:
WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC. and WORTHINGTON CYLINDERS WISCONSIN, LLC
CRS Site RD/RA Group v. Acme-Cleveland Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv01516
Plaintiff:
CRS Site RD/RA Group
Defendant:
Acme-Cleveland Corp., Danaher Corp., American Chemsol Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Bradley Englebrick, et al v. Worthington Industries, Inc.
as 13-56067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRADLEY ENGLEBRICK and ROXANNE HERNANDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Surace v. Worthington Industries, Inc.
as 1:2012cv01940
Plaintiff:
Joseph Surace
Defendant:
Worthington Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
