Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Naharaja v. Koch et al
as 2:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Kumar Naharaja
Defendant:
Thomas Kenneth Koch, Thomas Gregory Cooney, Carter Davidson Wray and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1595 a Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA)
Allen v. Wray
as 0:2022cv04536
Plaintiff:
Marcus O. Allen
Defendant:
Christopher A. Wray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Wray v. Reel
as 7:2022cv03204
Plaintiff:
Tony Wray
Defendant:
Kimberly Sarratt Reel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Reaves v. Keel et al
as 4:2022cv01023
Plaintiff:
Kathy Reaves and Kathy Juanita Reaves
Defendant:
Mark Keel, Henry McMaster and Christopher A. Wray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Myers v. Wray et al
as 5:2022cv00735
Plaintiff:
Javon Malik Myers
Defendant:
Patricia Wray, Willie Sweat, Major Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Reaves v. Dickens et al
as 4:2022cv00318
Plaintiff:
Kathy Juanita Reaves
Defendant:
Charles M. Dickens, South Carolina Highway Patrol, South Carolina Department of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Dowe v. Wray et al
as 1:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
Donta Malik Dowe
Defendant:
Patricia Wray, Willie Sweat, Major Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Capell v. Wray et al
as 5:2021cv03765
Plaintiff:
Kevin W Capell and Kevin Capell
Defendant:
Director Patricia Wray, Major Lumpkin and Capt Willie Sweat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
