Cases 1 - 10 of 15
GLOBAL TRADEMARKS, INC. v. ZHAO et al
as 2:2024cv07273
Plaintiff:
GLOBAL TRADEMARKS, INC.
Defendant:
LIMING ZHAO, SPARKY WORLDWIDE INC, JUN ZHANG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09804
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Customers Bank v. Endeavor 1 LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00374
Defendant:
Richard K Murray, Endeavor 1 LLC, Endeavor AL LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Customers Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00688
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1103 Immigration & Nationality Act of 1952
Xilin Chen v. USA
as 21-56317
Petitioner / Appellant:
XILIN CHEN
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
YIP, LLC v. The Individuals, Business Entities, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 0:2021cv60691
Plaintiff:
YIP, LLC
Defendant:
The Individuals, Business Entities, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, advancedtool-us, s-2344 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Xilin Chen v. United States of America
as 2:2019cv08257
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Xilin Chen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lee et al v. Xilin Association et al
as 1:2019cv02356
Plaintiff:
Yong Don Lee, Hokoon Lee, Gilbert Lee and others
Defendant:
Weihong Lu, Linda Yang and Xilin Association
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
USA v. Xilin Chen
as 18-50286
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
XILIN CHEN
Brodesser v. Xilin Association et al
as 1:2018cv03613
Plaintiff:
John Brodesser
Defendant:
Xilin Association, Wes Son and Linda Yang
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
