Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Muniz et al v. Li et al
as 1:2023cv15189
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER S. MUNIZ, IRMA N. MUNIZ and JUAN GARZA
Defendant:
XIAO HUAN LI, J&L FLOURISH EXPRESS, INC. and J&L Flourish Express, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Li v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02782
Plaintiff:
Xiao Li
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Raiser, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Xiaoming v. Chambers et al
as 1:2022cv02109
Plaintiff:
Cao Xiao Ming and Cao Xiaoming
Defendant:
Pam Chambers and Geico Insurance Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage/Product Liability
BROWN v. LAM et al
as 2:2022cv01434
Plaintiff:
CAMILLA BROWN
Defendant:
PING LAM and MIN XIAO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
XIA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv64293
Plaintiff:
XIAO DONG XIA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
XIA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv24919
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
XIAO QING XIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wang v. Villagomez et al
as 1:2021cv00014
Defendant:
Georgia Cabrera, Ken Camacho and Wally Villagomez
Plaintiff:
Xiao Ping Wang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanderlin v. Kim et al
as 2:2020cv00063
Plaintiff:
Jordan Tyler Sanderlin
Defendant:
Daniel Eugene Kin, Virasack Mack Phienboupha, Indie Srishord and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TU v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv20625
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
XIAO TU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Villella v. Lam
as 1:2019cv00539
Defendant:
John Doe Partnerships 1-5, Roe Governmental Agencies 1-5, Roe Non-Profit Corporations 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Gino Victor Villella
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
