Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Placido et al v. The Suma Sushi NYC, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv10534
Plaintiff:
Hector Placido, Ricardo Placido and Marcelo Carcamo
Defendant:
Guofeng Chen, The Suma Sushi NYC, Inc. d/b/a Suma Sushi, Guo Xun Chen and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lao et al v. The Suma Sushi NYC, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv08531
Plaintiff:
Yan En Lao
Defendant:
Suma Sushi NYC, Inc., Li Wen Qiu, Guofeng Chen and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Nolasco v. JTG International, Inc. et al
as 8:2016cv04129
Plaintiff:
Jose Yobianki Nolasco Nolasco
Defendant:
JTG International, Inc. , Tong Xia Liu, Gui Xun Chen and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Chen v. Holder
as 13-917
Petitioner:
Bin Xun Chen, AKA Bing Song Chen
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Ai et al v. Chen et al
as 1:2011cv00014
Plaintiff:
Fang Lin Ai, Fu Rong An, Fen Xiang Bai and others
Petitioner:
Ju Cao , Dan Ping Chang , Jin Hai Chen and others
Defendant:
Bo Chen , Hong Chen and Ju Mei Chen
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System v. Dickerson et al
as 1:2011cv11294
Plaintiff:
Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System
Defendant:
Gary E Dickerson , Richard A Aurelio , Robert W Dutton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Crane v. Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv11236
Plaintiff:
David Crane
Defendant:
Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc. , Richard A Aurelio , Gary E Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Chen v. Holder
as 11-2558
Petitioner:
Chi-Hsun Chen, AKA Qi Xun Chen
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Chen v. Still et al
as 3:2007cv01713
Petitioner:
Xun Chen, Xun Chen and Xun Chen
Respondent:
David Still, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
