Cases 41 - 50 of 93
LEE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2017cv01461
Petitioner:
JOHN Y. LEE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lee et al v. The Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 1:2016cv01197
Plaintiff:
Jong Y. Lee and Eun Soo Lee
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon , New Penn Financial, LLC and Samuel I. White, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Juliet Y. Lee v. Carolyn W. Colvin
as 2:2016cv04279
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Juliet Y. Lee
Johnson v. Paramo et al
as 3:2016cv00723
Plaintiff:
Herbert Johnson
Defendant:
Daniel Paramo, Seeley, Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Tezak v. Corey S. Cramin et al
as 8:2015cv01744
Defendant:
Corey S Cramin, Corey S Cramin, Geoffrey T Glass and others
Plaintiff:
William Tezak
John H Rasnick et al v. Jackson Lewis P.C. et al
as 5:2015cv04943
Plaintiff:
John H. Rasnick and J. Basil Mattingly
Defendant:
Jackson Lewis P.C., David R. Johanson, Douglas A. Rubel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Teresa Lee-Bautista v. John Bautista, Jr.
as 15-2176
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TERESA Y. LEE-BAUTISTA, CRAIG E. WHITE, Petitioner Attonrey of Record, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN J. BAUTISTA, SR., and in re: support and welfare of L.A.B. (daughter) and E.H.B. (son)
Lee-Bautista et al v. Loudoun JD & R District Court et al
as 1:2015cv00987
Plaintiff:
Teresa Y. Lee-Bautista , Brian M. Hirsh, Esq., Craig E. White, Esq. and others
Defendant:
John J. Bautista, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Soprey et al v. Lee
as 1:2015cv00296
Plaintiff:
Pandu R. Soprey and Renu Aggerwal
Defendant:
Richard Y. Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
