Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Lokesh Vuyyuru v. Y.S. Reddy, et al
as 24-7066
Plaintiff:
Lokesh B. Vuyyuru, M.D.
Defendant:
Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy, Gowtham Adani, Klaus Schwab and others
Y.S. v. New York City Department of Education
as 24-364
Plaintiff:
Y.S., individually and on behalf of S.F., a child with a disability
Defendant:
NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
New Yorkers Against Congestion Pricing Tax et al v. United States Department of Transportation et al
as 1:2024cv00367
Plaintiff:
New Yorkers Against Congestion Pricing Tax, Danny Buzzetta, Dr. Gregor Winkel and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Shailen Bhatt and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Sandles et al v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs
as 2:2023cv01665
Plaintiff:
Ray A Sandles, Yohannon Paul Edward Sandles and Y.S.
Defendant:
Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Estate of Clemente Najera Aguirre, et al v. County of Riverside, et al
as 23-55718
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ESTATE OF CLEMENTE NAJERA AGUIRRE, J.S., A.S. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE and DAN PONDER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv09574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped
A.Y.S. v. Red Roof Inns, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03767
Plaintiff:
A. Y.S.
Defendant:
Red Roof Inns, Inc. and Red Roof Franchising, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2068
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1914
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
