Cases 81 - 90 of 152
Jason Yun v. Yum Brands Inc et al
as 8:2013cv00147
Defendant:
Richard Carucci, Patrick Grismer, David C Novak and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Yun
William A Shader v. Yum Brands Inc, et al.
as 8:2013cv00140
Defendant:
Richard T Carucci, Patrick Grismer, David C Novak and others
Plaintiff:
William A Shader
Arun Bondali v. YUM! Brands, Inc. et al
as 8:2013cv00117
Plaintiff:
Arun Bondali
Defendant:
Richard T Carucci, Patrick Grismer, David C Novak and others
Yum! Brands, Inc v. Clarendon America Insurance Company
as 3:2012cv05973
Plaintiff:
Yum! Brands, Inc
Defendant:
Clarendon America Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv01863
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Janko Enterprises, Inc. v. Long John Silvers, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00345
Plaintiff:
Janko Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
Long John Silvers, Inc. , Yum! Brands, Inc. and LJS Partners LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Yum Restaurant Services Group, Inc. et al v. Interface Security Systems, LLC
as 3:2012cv00301
Plaintiff:
Yum Restaurant Services Group, Inc. , Yum! Brands, Inc. , KFC Corporation and others
Defendant:
Interface Security Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Newby v. Taco Bell of America Inc et al
as 1:2011cv00411
Estate_plaintiff:
Virgil Newby
Defendant:
Taco Bell of America Inc and Yum! Brands Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gollihar v. Yum! Brands Long Term Disability & Healthcare Program, et al.
as 1:2011cv01696
Plaintiff:
Brian Gollihar
Defendant:
Yum! Brands Long Term Disability and Healthcare Program and YUM! Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Olson v. Taco Bell Corp et al
as 1:2011cv02724
Plaintiff:
Jessica L Olson
Defendant:
Taco Bell Corp , Yum Brands Inc and Southeast QSR LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
