Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Henry v. York County et al
as 3:2021cv00247
Defendant:
John Doe IXX, John Doe(s) XV-XVII, John Doe I and others
Plaintiff:
Paul J. Henry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hengst, Jr. v. PrimeCare Medical, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv02023
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Hengst, Jr.
Defendant:
Nathan Fitzkee, PrimeCare Medical, Inc., Steven Bolding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palmer v. York County Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2020cv00539
Defendant:
Dr. Rameen Starling-Roney, John Doe Prison Guards 1-10, President Judge Joseph Adams and others
Plaintiff:
Rose Palmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Buono v. York County Prison Board et al
as 1:2018cv00100
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Buono
Defendant:
York County Prison Board, York County of Pennsylvania, Clair Doll and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Dortch v. Sabol et al
as 3:2017cv00492
Plaintiff:
Frank Dortch
Defendant:
Mary Sabol, York County Prison, Prime Care Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Haynes et al
as 1:2015cv00865
Plaintiff:
David M. Wright
Defendant:
Mark A. Haynes, David M. Whitcomb, Daniel H. Graff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fleckenstein et al v. Crawford et al
as 1:2014cv01085
Plaintiff:
Jeffery M. Fleckenstein , Jeremy M. Fleckenstein and Justin A. Fleckenstein
Defendant:
Ross W. Crawford, Jane/John Doe 1-20, Mary E. Sabol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Sabol et al
as 3:2014cv00358
Plaintiff:
Brice Bennett
Defendant:
Mary Sabol, Patricia Bennett and York County Prison Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Sabol et al
as 1:2011cv00691
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel T Banks
Defendant:
Mary Sabol, Clair Doll, John Steiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
