Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Russell et al v. The City of Franklin, Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Brian Russell, Marvin Young and Jeremy Slayden
Defendant:
The City of Franklin, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Clayton v. Hogan et al
as 3:2022cv00936
Plaintiff:
Mark Clayton
Defendant:
Lauren Hogan, Glenn Funk, Amy Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Young v. Christoff et al
as 2:2022cv02169
Plaintiff:
Teresa Young and Donella D.
Defendant:
Annie T. Christoff, Thomas Lee Parker, Magistrate Judge Annie T. Christoff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Southern Roofing & Renovations, LLC v. Austin et al
as 2:2021cv02516
Not Classified By Court:
Temiika Gipson
Plaintiff:
Southern Roofing & Renovations, LLC
Defendant:
Aron J. Austin and Pauline Austin-Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02011
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Young v. Venable
as 2:2020cv00226
Defendant:
Richard S. Venable
Plaintiff:
Huguette Nicole Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry v. White County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2020cv00063
Defendant:
Brandon Young, White County, Tennessee, Marissa Songer and others
Plaintiff:
Tosha N. Henry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
