Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Taebel v. Google, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00313
Plaintiff:
Mitch Taebel
Respondent:
Google, Inc. and Youtube, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freedom Watch, Inc. v. YouTube, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv22614
Plaintiff:
Freedom Watch, Inc.
Defendant:
YouTube, LLC and Sundar Pichai
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Trump et al v. YouTube, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv22445
Plaintiff:
Donald J. Trump, Kelly Victory, Austen Fletcher and others
Defendant:
YouTube, LLC and Sundar Pichai
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Trump et al v. YouTube, LLC et al
as 0:2021cv61384
Plaintiff:
Donald J. Trump, Kelly Victory and Austen Fletcher
Defendant:
YouTube, LLC and Sundar Pichai
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
THE INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK et al v. YouTube LLC et al
as 4:2020cv09456
Plaintiff:
DEL BIGTREE and THE INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK
Defendant:
Facebook Inc. and YouTube LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Doe et al v. Google LLC et al
as 5:2020cv07502
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DOE, POLLY ST. GEORGE, SARAH WESTALL and others
Defendant:
YouTube LLC and Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Daniels v. Alphabet Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv04687
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc., YouTube LLC and Google LLC
Plaintiff:
Marshall Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Newman et al v. Google LLC et al
as 3:2020cv04011
Plaintiff:
Catherine Jones, Denotra Nicole Lewis, Lisa Cabrera and others
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc., YouTube LLC and Google LLC
Not Classified By Court:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lewis v. Google Inc et al
as 3:2020cv00085
Defendant:
Google LLC and YouTube LLC
Plaintiff:
Bob Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramani v. YouTube LLC
as 4:2019cv07261
Plaintiff:
Valmiki D. Ramani
Defendant:
YouTube LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
