Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Guzman v. Stephens et al
as 1:2026cv00304
Plaintiff:
Frank Tony Guzman
Defendant:
Zena Stephens and Director, Texas Department of Public Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pugh v. Stephens et al
as 1:2025cv00489
Plaintiff:
K'Shawn Pugh
Defendant:
Zena Stephens, M. Guillory and Officer FNU Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peoples v. Stephens et al
as 1:2025cv00476
Plaintiff:
Raymond Reginald Peoples, Jr
Defendant:
Zena Stephens, John Scott, Brent Webster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peoples v. Stephens
as 1:2025cv00477
Plaintiff:
Raymond Reginald Peoples, Jr
Defendant:
Zena Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cole v. Stephens et al
as 1:2025cv00296
Plaintiff:
Donald J Cole, IV
Defendant:
Zena Stephens, Michael . Guillory, M. Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bernal, Jr. v. Stephens et al
as 1:2025cv00187
Plaintiff:
Dennis F. Bernal, Jr.
Defendant:
Zena Stephens, FNU Chauberger, M. Guillory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bernal, Jr. v. Stephens et al
as 1:2025cv00170
Petitioner:
Dennis F. Bernal, Jr.
Respondent:
Sheriff Zena Stephens, Major M. Guillory, Lt. R. Nabors and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peoples v. Stephens
as 1:2025cv00117
Plaintiff:
Raymond Reginald Peoples, Jr
Defendant:
Zena Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duhon v. Cormier et al
as 1:2025cv00085
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Tyvone Duhon
Defendant:
Jarvis Cormier, Paulette Maholmes, Zena Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whatley v. Stephens et al
as 1:2025cv00072
Plaintiff:
John Mark Whatley
Defendant:
Zena Stephens, FNU Minter, FNU Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
