Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Rute v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 5:2023cv04032
Plaintiff:
Zoe Leanne Rute
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hike v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2022cv00217
Plaintiff:
Zoe Hike
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Majkowski v. Saul
as 2:2021cv00561
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Deanna Zoe Majkowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Briggs v. Social Security
as 3:2021cv05261
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Zoe Briggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Streiker v. Saul
as 1:2019cv04442
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Zoe Streiker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Tyr v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv05268
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Zoe Tyr
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Briggs v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv05670
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Zoe Briggs
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Causey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2017cv01923
Plaintiff:
Zoe T Causey
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Lipsmeyer v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2016cv02173
Plaintiff:
Priscilla Zoe Lipsmeyer
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Montez v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv00177
Plaintiff:
Zoe Raquel Montez
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
