Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Liptok v. City of Pottsville, PA, et al
as 3:2023cv01303
Plaintiff:
John J. Liptok
Defendant:
City Of Pottsville Pa., et al, City Council, Dorothy Botto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LIPTOK v. CITY OF POTTSVILLE PA., ET AL
as 2:2023cv02942
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. LIPTOK
Defendant:
CITY OF POTTSVILLE PA., ET AL, CITY COUNCIL, DOROTHY BOTTO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CZYZEWSKI v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv01214
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Czyzewski
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Doss v. Bureau of Prison and It's Correctional Officers Federal Employees et al
as 1:2019cv00272
Defendant:
C/O Ready, Bureau of Prison and It's Correctional Officers Federal Employees, C/O Munchler and others
Plaintiff:
Darnell Doss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Almuhsin v. Warden of Dauphin C.P.
as 1:2016cv00365
Plaintiff:
Ayyub Almuhsin
Defendant:
Warden of Dauphin C.P., Isaiah Rotan Rotan and Other Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanton v. Howell et al
as 3:2011cv02292
Petitioner:
Floyd B. Stanton
Respondent:
Donald F. Howell, Warden David Yeingst, Tom Radle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. WILLOUGHBY et al
as 2:2010cv04906
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. SMITH
Defendant:
WILLOUGHBY, BROWN, MAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00671
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
JIMENEZ-JIMENEZ v. SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 2:2009cv00304
Petitioner:
EMILIO JIMENEZ-JIMENEZ
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, JOSEPH SALEMI and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
