Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Stow v. Davis
as 23-1415
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WESTON J. STOW
Defendant / Appellee:
ANNE DAVIS, Dr., Phd., Education Principal and Supervisor of NHDOC Library Services, NH State Prison for Men and ANNE DAVIS, Doctor, Phd., Education Principal and Supervisor of NHDOC Library Services, NH State Prison for Men
Defendant:
GEORGE CORRIVEAU, Nurse, Northern NH Correctional Facility
Interested Party:
JOHN M. FORMELLA, NH Attorney General and NH DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Stow v. Davis
as 22-1433
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WESTON J. STOW
Defendant / Appellee:
ANNE DAVIS, Dr., Phd., Education Principal and Supervisor of NHDOC Library Services, NH State Prison for Men
Defendant:
GEORGE CORRIVEAU, Nurse, Northern NH Correctional Facility
Interested Party:
JOHN M. FORMELLA, NH Attorney General and NH DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Stow v. Davis
as 22-1264
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WESTON J. STOW
Defendant / Appellee:
ANNE DAVIS, Dr., Phd., Education Principal and Supervisor of NHDOC Library Services, NH State Prison for Men
Defendant:
GEORGE CORRIVEAU, Nurse, NH Northern Correctional Facility and GEORGE CORRIVEAU, Nurse, Northern NH Correctional Facility
Interested Party:
JOHN M. FORMELLA, NH Attorney General and NH DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Davis v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2019cv11616
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Plaintiff:
Ann Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zone Five, LLC et al v. Textron, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00393
Plaintiff:
BTICG Leasing, Inc., Jay Elliott, Tim Van Every and others
Defendant:
Textron Aviation, Inc. and Textron, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stow v. Davis et al
as 1:2018cv00768
Defendant:
George Corriveau and Anne Davis
Plaintiff:
Weston J. Stow
Undetermined:
NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only) and NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
