Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Woods v. Chilton County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Woods
Defendant:
Chilton County Jail, Ann Davis and Kathy Garrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frost v. Davenport et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Jared Dakota Frost
Defendant:
Jennifer Davenport, Byron Oliver, Alan Smitherman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacobs v. Davis et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00428
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Jacobs
Defendant:
Chilton County Jail, Ann Davis and Trey Barfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Chilton County System et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00144
Plaintiff:
Tabeus Dewayne Robinson
Defendant:
Chilton County Jail, Ann Davis, Kathy Garris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Davis (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00847
Plaintiff:
Daniel Leo Bailey, Sr.
Defendant:
Ann Davis and Chilton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Chilton County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00777
Plaintiff:
Tabeus Dewayne Robinson
Defendant:
Chilton County Jail, Ann Davis, Trae Barfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Davis et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00759
Plaintiff:
Christopher Norris Simmons
Defendant:
Ann Davis, Kathy Garris and Chilton County Jail Admin.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Public Defenders Office
as 4:2012cv00175
Plaintiff:
Lacinda Ann Davis
Defendant:
Public Defenders Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Barfield et al (INMATE1)(CONSENT)
as 2:2011cv00627
Plaintiff:
Andrew Anglodious Williams
Defendant:
Trey Barfield , Ann Davis , Mike Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jerido v. Harmon et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2010cv00310
Plaintiff:
Antonio Orlander Jerido
Defendant:
Ken Harmon, Ann Davis, Captain White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
