Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Boffoli v. Nellis
as 1:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
Christopher Boffoli doing business as Big Appetites Studio
Defendant:
Jim Nellis doing business as R.I. Food Fights
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Boffoli v. Gilliver
as 3:2023cv00684
Plaintiff:
Christopher Boffoli
Defendant:
David Gilliver
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Boffoli v. Editorial Telivisa SA de CV
as 2:2022cv01582
Plaintiff:
Christopher Boffoli
Defendant:
Editorial Telivisa SA de CV
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Boffoli v. Camfield Catering LLC
as 4:2022cv01839
Plaintiff:
Christopher Boffoli
Defendant:
Camfield Catering LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Christopher Boffoli v. NetEase, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00243
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 10, NetEase, Inc. and Guangzhou NetEase Computer System Co., Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Christopher Boffoli
Interested Party:
Minden Pictures, Inc. and Dana Hursey
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Alex Maxim v. Netease, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv11331
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 10, Netease, Inc. and Guangzhou Netease Computer System Co., Ltd
Plaintiff:
Alex Maxim
Interested Party:
Minden Pictures, Inc., Dana Hursey and Christopher Boffoli
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Boffoli v. Wix.com Inc
as 2:2020cv01610
Plaintiff:
Christopher Boffoli
Defendant:
Wix.com Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Boffoli v. Hearst Communications Inc et al
as 2:2020cv01254
Defendant:
Midland Publishing Company, LLC, Hearst Newspapers, LLC, Hearst Communicatons Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Boffoli
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Boffoli v. Zazzle Inc
as 2:2020cv01083
Defendant:
Zazzle Inc.
Plaintiff:
Christopher Boffoli
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Boffoli v. Facebook Inc
as 2:2020cv00237
Defendant:
Facebook, Inc
Plaintiff:
Christopher Boffoli
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
