Cases 1 - 10 of 30
BLACK v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv10330
Plaintiff:
CINDY BLACK
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martinez v. Napa State Hospital et al
as 3:2023cv04247
Plaintiff:
Marcella Elizabeth Martinez
Defendant:
Napa State Hospital, California Department of State Hospitals and Cindy Black
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Black v. Department of State Hospitals et al
as 3:2022cv05037
Plaintiff:
Siva D. Black
Defendant:
Department of State Hospitals, Cindy Black, MD Sarah J. Polfliet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Navarrete v. Black
as 2:2022cv01197
Petitioner:
Michael Joel Navarrete
Respondent:
Cindy Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Michl v. Black
as 2:2022cv00688
Petitioner:
Joshua Michl
Respondent:
Cindy Black and Napa State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Black
as 3:2022cv01723
Petitioner:
Burl Evans
Respondent:
Cindy Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Craig v. Black et al
as 2:2022cv00200
Petitioner:
Norman John Craig
Respondent:
Cindy Black and Napa State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Clark v. Black, et al.
as 2:2021cv02017
Petitioner:
Alphonso R. Clark and Alphonso Ramon Clark
Respondent:
Cindy Black and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clark v. Black et al
as 3:2021cv08371
Petitioner:
Alphonso R. Clark
Respondent:
Cindy Black and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(HC)Caridad v. Black
as 2:2021cv00704
Petitioner:
Benjamin Tabayoyong Caridad
Respondent:
Cindy Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
