Cases 1 - 10 of 985
Pal v. Tallberg et al
as 3:2024cv00792
Plaintiff:
Neelu Pal
Defendant:
James N Tallberg, Andrew J Glass, Patrick D Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alvarado v. Maldenado et al
as 3:2024cv00761
Plaintiff:
Marcus Alvarado
Defendant:
Maldenado, Rich Hardy, Kevin Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024mc00038
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bugg v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00521
Plaintiff:
Rayshaun D. Bugg
Defendant:
Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Easton v. Oliver et al
as 3:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
Curtis D. Easton
Defendant:
T Oliver and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith, Jr. II v. Osborn CI
as 3:2024cv00574
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Smith, Jr. II
Defendant:
Osborn CI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooney v. Schachter et al
as 3:2024cv00497
Plaintiff:
James Cooney
Defendant:
M.D. Aaron Schachter and Connecticut Orthopaedic Specialists, P.C., d/b/a Connecticut Orthopaedics
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Kerwick v. Pullman & Comley LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Ms. Colleen Mary-Elaine Kerwick
Defendant:
Pullman & Comley LLC, State of Connecticut, Kenneth D. Savino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Andrews v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00424
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Andrews, II
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Jesus Guadarramma and Robert Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chounlamontry v. Shorttall et al
as 3:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Mike Chounlamontry
Defendant:
Joseph M. Shorttall d/b/a Judge and Stan Moskowitz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
