Cases 1 - 10 of 226
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities Act
White v. Higgins et al
as 4:2023cv01125
Plaintiff:
Edward White
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Randy Morgan, Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Robinson v. Crittenden County et al
as 2:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
Kendrick D Robinson
Defendant:
Crittenden County, Kelsie Rogers, Terry Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Rudick v. Woodruff County Arkansas et al
as 3:2023cv00173
Plaintiff:
Joseph D Rudick
Defendant:
Woodruff County Arkansas, Phil Reynolds and Jody Akins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bradley v. Allen et al
as 4:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Dana Ruby Bradley
Defendant:
Wes Allen, Nancy Dahlstrom, Adrian Fontes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Robinson v. Scoggins
as 4:2023cv00052
Plaintiff:
Reginald D Robinson
Defendant:
James Scoggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Kurck v. Lonoke County Sheriff Department et al
as 4:2023cv00011
Defendant:
Danielle Cobb, Lonoke County Sheriff Department, John Staley and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy D Kurck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
