Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Daniel Cadle v. William Jefferson, et al
as 26-5149
Plaintiff:
DANIEL C. CADLE, Individually and Derivatively on Behalf of the Corporation and the Shareholders of iGate, Inc.
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
WILLIAM J. JEFFERSON and VERNON L. JACKSON
Daniel Teal v. Attorney General, State of Flo, et al
as 20-12740
Defendant / Appellee:
TONI BOWDEN, Greviance Coordinator Supervisor, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, G. WELLHAUSEN, Greviance Coordinator and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL K. TEAL
Jordan et al v. State Farm Lloyds et al
as 6:2019cv00092
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds, Igat Issamene Ombila and Ombila Igat Issamene
Plaintiff:
Timothy Jordan and Tracy Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FILING ERROR
as 1:2019cv01023
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds and Ombila Igat Issamene
Plaintiff:
Timothy Jordan and Tracy Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LODHI et al v. UNITEDHEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2015cv00662
Plaintiff:
MAJID LODHI
Defendant:
UNITEDHEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY and iGATE CORPORATION LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Wood v. IGATE Technologies, Inc.
as 4:2015cv00799
Plaintiff:
Barbara Wood
Defendant:
IGATE Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Jain v. iGate Corporation et al
as 5:2013cv02737
Plaintiff:
Ashish Kumar Jain
Defendant:
iGate Corporation and Phaneesh Murthy
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv07911
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
