Cases 1 - 10 of 30,784
AMERSON v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER L AMERSON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER, DEPUTY WARDEN DERRICK MCDANIEL, DEPUTY WARDEN CURTIS L JEFFERIES, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Willey et al
as 1:2024cv02149
Plaintiff:
Segundo Adams
Defendant:
James O. Willey, F. L. Moore & Sons, Inc. and National Interstate Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Claud v. Howard et al
as 1:2024cv02155
Plaintiff:
Roland Claud
Defendant:
Paul Howard and Greg L. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-11573
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hudson v. Hut et al
as 7:2024cv00620
Plaintiff:
Deontae L Hudson
Defendant:
Hut, McCovery, Hardclaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Mansukkani et al
as 5:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Davante Johnson
Defendant:
FNU Mansukkani, FNU Harr, FNU Barry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
South et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00597
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Robert South, Edward W Allsman, David L Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Como v. Mazel Pizza LLC et al
as 1:2024cv21848
Plaintiff:
Antony Como
Defendant:
Mazel Pizza LLC doing business as Lenny's Pizza and Leonard L. Reiz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
MURZIKE v. CARR et al
as 3:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
J E CARR, T DYKES, C W CATTNACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
