Cases 1 - 10 of 125
Swinson v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv00591
Plaintiff:
Lydell Swinson
Defendant:
CO Smith, Unit Manager Heenan, Unit Manager Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
SMITH v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2022cv05092
Plaintiff:
MATTHIAS WAGMAN, MACKENZIE SMITH, MICHAEL SMITH and others
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
GEORGE v. LARSON DESIGN GROUP, INC.
as 2:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
GERALD GEORGE
Defendant:
LARSON DESIGN GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
HOPKINS v. ROGERS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv05613
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HOPKINS
Defendant:
ROGERS CORPORATION, BRUCE D HOECHNER, KEITH L BARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
EASLEY v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2021cv00251
Plaintiff:
WARREN EASLEY
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, OBERLANDER, SARATELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
REDFIELD v. FBL FINANCIAL INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01795
Defendant:
CRAIG D HILL, PAUL E LARSON, ROGER K BROOKS and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL A JUFFER and DENISE REDFIELD
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WATERMAN v. BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01736
Defendant:
GLORIA C LARSON, LUIS A UBINAS, MARK F FURLONG and others
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
BULLARD v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2021cv01590
Defendant:
MOORE, SGT. MILES, SGT. D. THOMAS LARSON and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES FOY BULLARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LONDON v. HIGGINS et al
as 5:2021cv00831
Defendant:
DETECTIVE JESSICA HIGGINS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY CHRISTOPHER LARSON, DANENE SORACE and others
Plaintiff:
DWAIN STEWART LONDON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
