Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00690
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00689
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv07206
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00603
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Baray v. Ardent Health Partners, LLC et al
as 1:2026cv01828
Plaintiff:
Sandra Baray
Defendant:
Ardent Health Partners, LLC, AHS Management Company, Inc., Lovelace Health System, LLC, d/b/a Lovelace Women's Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
David Garsia v. William Procida, et al
as 26-1528
Plaintiff:
DAVID J. GARSIA
Defendant:
WILLIAM PROCIDA, MICHAEL R. LEIGHTON, SHARI HARTSTEIN and others
Howe v. NAI Saturn Eastern LLC et al
as 8:2026cv00810
Plaintiff:
Karen Howe, Allison Howe and Lisa Howe
Defendant:
NAI Saturn Eastern LLC and Bo Y Kang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Pat Suarez v. Nay Phe et al
as 5:2026cv00120
Plaintiff:
Pat Suarez
Defendant:
Helen X. Liu, Nay Phe doing business as El Mercadito Market and Does 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Chan (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2026cv00137
Plaintiff:
Nai Lyi Chan
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
