Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv07988
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00621
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Guo et al v. Jervell et al
as 4:2018cv01759
Plaintiff:
Xin He Guo and Ping Yang
Defendant:
Kelly Jervell, Forward Air Corporation and FAF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arizona Foundation for Chinese Religious Rights et al v. True North LLC et al
as 2:2017cv03315
Plaintiff:
Arizona Foundation for Chinese Religious Rights , Ping Su , Ping Yang and others
Defendant:
True North LLC, 668 North LLC , David C Tedesco and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv05568
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv07212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Juicy Couture Inc. v. Bella International Limited et al
as 1:2012cv05801
Plaintiff:
Juicy Couture Inc.
Defendant:
Bella International Limited, Juicy Girl Ltd., Gold Stable International Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Brookshire v. Blethen et al
as 4:2010cv05773
Plaintiff:
Vondra L. Brookshire
Defendant:
Roger W. Blethen , David G. Tacelli , Stephen M. Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brookshire v. Blethen et al
as 3:2010cv05773
Plaintiff:
Vondra L. Brookshire
Defendant:
Roger W. Blethen, David G. Tacelli, Stephen M. Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
