Cases 1 - 9 of 9
SMITH v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2022cv05092
Plaintiff:
MATTHIAS WAGMAN, MACKENZIE SMITH, MICHAEL SMITH and others
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
SIMMONS v. GARDA WORLDS et al
as 2:2022cv00513
Plaintiff:
ALVIN R SIMMONS
Defendant:
GARDA WORLDS and ROBERT RUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
BLAKE v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv02933
Plaintiff:
SUSAN RUE BLAKE
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Miller v. Zandieh et al
as 1:2015cv00034
Plaintiff:
Loretta Lax Miller
Defendant:
Ata Richard Zandieh, Bruce F. Bratton, Frederick Rue Martsolf and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
GRAHAM v. ROSENBLUM et al
as 2:2014cv03390
Plaintiff:
RONALD GRAHAM
Defendant:
DAVID ROSENBLUM, SUSIE ROSENBLUM, D&F CLOTHING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL BENEFIT FUND v. RUE ELECTRIC, INC.
as 2:2013cv06357
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL BENEFIT FUND
Defendant:
RUE ELECTRIC, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
MUNSON v. THE CFCF PRISON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY ON STATE ROAD et al
as 2:2013cv04266
Plaintiff:
PAUL MUNSON
Defendant:
THE CFCF PRISON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY ON STATE ROAD, HASLEM, GRAHM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUE v. PITTSBURGH-CORNING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv89772
Plaintiff:
PATSY RUE, PATSY RUE, PATSY RUE and others
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH-CORNING CORPORATION, PITTSBURGH-CORNING CORPORATION, PITTSBURGH-CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
RUE v. E.D. BULLARD et al
as 2:2008cv61117
Plaintiff:
LEROY RUE, JR., LEROY RUE, JR., LEROY RUE, JR. and others
Defendant:
E.D. BULLARD, ATLAS TURNER, INC., ATLAS TURNER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
