Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01794
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
IN RE: ALHUSSEIN V. ERITRA CHICKEN FARMS CORP.
as 2:2026cv05721
Plaintiff:
MUSAB MOHAMED SALIH ALHUSSEIN and WINGSTOP RESTAURANTS INC
Defendant:
ERITREA CHICKEN FARMS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Salih v. Fremont Police Department et al
as 3:2026cv07927
Plaintiff:
Vincent Lee Salih
Defendant:
Fremont Police Department, City of Fremont, Santa Rita County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00545
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv07279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Salih v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2026cv00256
Plaintiff:
Hamad Salih
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv12663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Yaseen Salih v. Attorney General United States of America
as 26-2451
Petitioner:
YASEEN AYMEN SALIH
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Salih v. Warden et al
as 4:2026cv01512
Petitioner:
Yaseen Aymen Salih
Respondent:
Warden, Acting Director, Secretary and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
