Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada et al v. Strong Man Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2021mc00027
Plaintiff:
Local 88 International Association of Sheet Metal Air, Rail and Transportation Workers, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Health Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada and others
Defendant:
Strong Man Services Incorporated doing business as SMS Mechanical, John Frederick Capurro and Jason Russell Hales
Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada et al v. Strong Man Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2021mc00031
Plaintiff:
Local 88 International Association of Sheet Metal Air, Rail and Transportation Workers, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Health Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada and others
Defendant:
Strong Man Services Incorporated doing business as SMS Mechanical, John Frederick Capurro and Jason Russell Hales
Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada et al v. Strong Man Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2021mc00029
Plaintiff:
Local 88 International Association of Sheet Metal Air, Rail and Transportation Workers, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Health Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada and others
Defendant:
Strong Man Services Incorporated doing business as SMS Mechanical, John Frederick Capurro and Jason Russell Hales
Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada et al v. Strong Man Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2021mc00030
Plaintiff:
Local 88 International Association of Sheet Metal Air, Rail and Transportation Workers, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Health Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada and others
Defendant:
Strong Man Services Incorporated doing business as SMS Mechanical, John Frederick Capurro and Jason Russell Hales
Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada et al v. Strong Man Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2021mc00028
Plaintiff:
Local 88 International Association of Sheet Metal Air, Rail and Transportation Workers, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Health Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada and others
Defendant:
Strong Man Services Incorporated doing business as SMS Mechanical, John Frederick Capurro and Jason Russell Hales
Sitani v. Bradley et al
as 2:2021cv00732
Defendant:
E Barajas, Unknown Olsen, J Bradley and others
Plaintiff:
Rory K Sitani
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toraty et al v. Kennedy et al
as 4:2020cv00345
Plaintiff:
Julia Baldino, Brittany Johnson, Vana Steele and others
Defendant:
C Kennedy, LD Baugus, JW Bingham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Debesay v. SM Law PC
as 2:2020cv00109
Plaintiff:
Biniam Debesay
Defendant:
SM Law PC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Molino et al v. Sandoval et al
as 2:2014cv02460
Plaintiff:
Steven G Molino and SM Investments LLC
Defendant:
Anthony Sandoval, Daryl Garcia and Michael C Shiel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SMS Financial XXVII LLC v. Shaaban DDS Incorporated et al
as 2:2013cv01106
Plaintiff:
SMS Financial XXVII LLC
Defendant:
Shaaban DDS Incorporated , Shady Shaaban and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
