Cases 21 - 30 of 1,316
McDonald v. Kilgore
as 1:2019cv01958
Respondent:
Jimmy Kilgore
Petitioner:
David Alonzo Ray McDonald
Defendant:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Aguedo v. United States of America
as 2:2019cv00693
Interested Party:
Staff Attorneys
Plaintiff:
Zacharias Abab Aguedo
Defendant:
United States of America and Walter Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Balcom v. Valenza et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2019cv00116
Defendant:
Lt. Jones, Jason Smoak, Sgt. Watson and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Devone Balcom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruskjer v. Woods (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00006
Plaintiff:
David E. Ruskjer
Defendant:
Staff Attorneys and Walter Wood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Blevins v. Terrelle et al
as 2:2018cv02033
Defendant:
Garden, Fleeton, Terrelle and others
Plaintiff:
Reginals T Blevins and Reginald T Blevins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Gordy et al
as 2:2018cv00989
Petitioner:
Edward Dwight Coleman
Respondent:
C Gordy and Attorney General of Alabama
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Warren v. Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
as 5:2018cv00982
Petitioner:
Weldon Ray Warren
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anderson v. Wright et al
as 5:2018cv00971
Petitioner:
Amy Bishop Anderson
Respondent:
Wright and Attorney General of the State of ALabama
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gonzalez v. Decatur, Alabama et al
as 5:2018cv00972
Petitioner:
Alberto Gonzalez
Respondent:
Decatur, Alabama and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Guy v. Bates et al
as 2:2018cv00974
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jon Guy
Defendant:
Bates, Turner, Jasmine and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
