Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Brooks v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02337
Petitioner:
Unique Brooks
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brooks v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02751
Petitioner:
Unique Brooks
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Brooks v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02471
Plaintiff:
Unique Brooks
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Brooks v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02465
Petitioner:
Unique Brooks
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Brooks v. Felts et al
as 2:2022cv02077
Plaintiff:
Unique Brooks
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Felts, Correctional Officer Coleman, Correctional Officer Lowery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Memphis Police Department et al
as 2:2021cv02725
Plaintiff:
Unique Brooks
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department, Kenneth Southerland, D. Cherry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Blair et al
as 2:2021cv02701
Plaintiff:
Unique Brooks
Defendant:
C. Blair, T. Smith, T. Lowery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. United States Marshals Service
as 2:2021cv02679
Petitioner:
Unique Brooks
Respondent:
United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Parton v. Veterans United Home Loans et al (TV1)
as 3:2021cv00015
Plaintiff:
Hannah Matthews Parton
Defendant:
Linda Unique and Veterans United Home Loans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harris v. Unique Automotive, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00640
Defendant:
Brad Miser, Unique Automotive, Inc., Driven Music City, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Viktor Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
