Cases 31 - 40 of 99
Gapski v. United States Postal Service et al
as 3:2019cv00314
Defendant:
Celina Insurance Group, Terry D Young and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Michael Gapski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Ocasio v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2019cv00147
Plaintiff:
Manuel Ocasio
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
HOGAN v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2018cv03763
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA L. HOGAN and VIRGINIA HOGAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, RYDER TRUCK RENTAL, INC., STEPHEN EHRGOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
BECK v. POOR et al
as 1:2018cv02575
Plaintiff:
DONALD W. BECK
Defendant:
STEPHANIE POOR and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Hall et al v. Souder et al
as 1:2018cv00210
Plaintiff:
Clifford Hall and Kathy Hall
Defendant:
Mark Souder, United States Postal Service, Nester Construction and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Woodham et al v. United States Postal Service et al
as 3:2018cv00512
Defendant:
Kristopher A Block, United States Postal Service and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Gary S Woodham, Wendy K Woodham and Garry S Woodham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JB v The United States of America et al
as 2:2018cv00003
Plaintiff:
J B
Defendant:
The United States of America and The United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Baublitz v. Baublitz et al
as 2:2018cv00002
Plaintiff:
Jurnee Baublitz
Defendant:
Ivan Baublitz, The United States of America and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00915
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04271
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
