Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Peter Gakuba v. April
as 23-2303
Plaintiff:
PETER GAKUBA
Defendant:
APRIL, Customer Service, USPS, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Michael Owl Feather-Gorbey v. Warden
as 23-7155
Petitioner / Appellant:
(CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY, Monacan Nation Director of Project Authority
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, USP Thompson
Benjamin Crisantos v. Robert Sims
as 23-6414
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN JOSEPH CRISANTOS
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT SIMS, f/k/a Sims, Federal Correctional Officer, JOSHUA SINES, f/k/a Sans, Federal Correctional Officer USP Hazelton, ERIC HOWELL, Deputy Captain USP Hazelton and others
Justin Allee v. J. Streeval
as 23-6375
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUSTIN J. ALLEE
Defendant / Appellee:
J. C. STREEVAL, Warden of USP Lee, MR. HICKS, Assistant Warden of USP Lee, MR. GOLDEY, Assistant Warden of USP Lee and others
Kristopher Daniels v. Shirk
as 23-6296
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KRISTOPHER OWEN DANIELS
Defendant / Appellee:
SHIRK, Unit Manager, USP HAZELTON MEDICAL, USP HAZELTON COMPOUND, Facility Operations and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-7471
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Leonard Mathews v. Warden
as 22-7193
Petitioner / Appellant:
LEONARD MATHEWS
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, USP Lee
James Rosemond v. Richard Hudgins
as 22-7188
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES ROSEMOND
Respondent / Appellee:
RICHARD HUDGINS, Warden, USP Hazelton
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Williams
as 22-6875
Plaintiff / Appellant:
(CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN JANE OR JOHN DOE, Director, IRS Department of the Treasury, WILLIAMS, Reck Officer, FCI Beckley, FORREN, Lieutenant, FCI Beckley and others
Phillip Neal v. Warden, USP Lee
as 22-6777
Petitioner / Appellant:
PHILLIP LENARD NEAL
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, USP LEE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
