Cases 1 - 10 of 181
Sharlene v. USPS
as 3:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Jackson and Jackson Sharlene
Defendant:
USPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Green v. Warden, USP Canaan
as 1:2024cv00131
Petitioner:
Reginald Edward Green
Respondent:
Warden, USP Canaan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Warden, USP Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00057
Petitioner:
Gregory Marshall Hill
Respondent:
Warden, USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Guzman v. Warden, USP Marion
as 5:2024cv00191
Petitioner:
Ricardo Guzman
Respondent:
Warden, USP Marion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wilson v. Warden, USP Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00018
Petitioner:
Andrew Scott Wilson
Respondent:
Warden, USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Owens v. Warden, USP Beaumont
as 1:2023cv00474
Petitioner:
Lesley Tyra Owens
Respondent:
Warden, USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Beames v. USPS
as 4:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Christine Gabrielle Beames
Defendant:
USPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Torres v. USP Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Francisco Torres
Defendant:
USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Carr et al v. United States et al
as 3:2023cv02875
Plaintiff:
Brian P Carr, Rueangrong Carr and Buakhao Von Kramer
Defendant:
United States, US Department of Justice, United States Postal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kozman v.United States Postal Service et al
as 4:2024cv00048
Defendant:
USPS - Postal Service, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Mona Kozman
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
