Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv04958
Plaintiff:
Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft and Swarovski North America Limited
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Dongguan Yangyu Stainless Steel Goods Co., Ltd., Guangzhou Beishi Gifts Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Hu v. Majestic Star Casino et al
as 1:2017cv00415
Plaintiff:
Yaodi Hu
Defendant:
Majestic Star Casino, Gary, City of, Indiana, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hu v. Blue Chip Casino LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00409
Plaintiff:
Yaodi Hu
Defendant:
Blue Chip Casino LLC, Boyd Gaming Inc. and Michigan City, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yaodi Hu v. William Lee
as 14-1975
Petitioner:
YAODI HU
Respondent:
WILLIAM C. LEE
Party-in-Interest:
AMTRAK, LAKE COUNTY, INDIANA, CITY OF WHITING, Indiana and others
Hu v. Amtrak U.S.A et al
as 2:2014cv00129
Plaintiff:
Yaodi Hu
Defendant:
Amtrak U.S.A , Lake County IN , Whiting IN City of and others
Estate_plaintiff:
Yanqiong Yao
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hu v. Amtrak U.S.A et al
as 1:2013cv08160
Plaintiff:
Yaodi Hu
Defendant:
Amtrak U.S.A , Lake County, IN, City of Whiting, IN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hu v. Communist Party of China et al
as 1:2012cv01213
Plaintiff:
Yaodi Hu
Defendant:
Communist Party of China, People's Republic of China, Li Peng and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hu v. Zhou
as 1:2012cv01203
Plaintiff:
Yaodi Hu
Defendant:
Jun Zhou
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Marquette Bank v. Tam et al
as 1:2012cv03296
Plaintiff:
Marquette Bank
Defendant:
Warren O. Tam, Yaodi Hu and Ying Hua Tam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
