Cases 21 - 30 of 3,571
Hodge v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01475
Plaintiff:
Terri Lynn Hodge
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC and AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Naemi v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC et al
as 4:2024cv02041
Plaintiff:
Naema Naemi
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Services LLC and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Morvarid Emamy v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00734
Plaintiff:
Morvarid Emamy
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Aror-ark O'diah v. John Roberts, et al
as 24-5074
Plaintiff:
Aror-ark Ark O'diah
Defendant:
John G. Roberts, Chief Justice, United States Small Business Administration, also known as United States Small Business Administration, SBA, Isabella Casillas Guzman, SBA Administrator and others
Unruh et al v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01414
Plaintiff:
Ryan Unruh and Christopher Isbell
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC and AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Ms. Jaami Ali v. AT & T, et al
as 24-1682
Plaintiff:
Ms. Jaami Ali
Defendant:
AT & T, T-Mobile USA, Inc., T-Mobile for Sprint and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Humes v. T-Mobile Security John Doe
as 4:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Humes
Defendant:
T-Mobile Security John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00916
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
