Cases 1 - 10 of 85,062
Smith-Egizio v. Rivello et al
as 1:2024cv00767
Petitioner:
Tyler Smith-Egizio
Respondent:
Superintendent J. Rivello, Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and PA Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Laubscher v. Warden of Clinton County Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2024cv00768
Petitioner:
William Sean Laubscher
Respondent:
Warden of Clinton County Correctional Facility, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hinshaw v. Moore et al
as 1:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
Jason Dewight Hinshaw
Defendant:
Keri L. Moore, John Rivello, John Kohler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GIDDINGS v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2024cv00674
Plaintiff:
LEVI GIDDINGS
Defendant:
M. J. ZAKEN, S. BUZAS, MR. COULEHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Burr v. Warden of SCI-Greene et al
as 1:2024cv00759
Petitioner:
Dwain Burr
Respondent:
Warden of SCI-Greene and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALVES v. WARDEN et al
as 2:2024cv05876
Petitioner:
CARLOS S. ALVES
Respondent:
WARDEN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
IN RE QUINZEL KK CAIBY
as 2:2024cv01936
Plaintiff:
QUINZEL KK CAIBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burton v. Crawford et al
as 4:2024cv00761
Plaintiff:
Dante Burton
Defendant:
C.O. Crawford, C.O. Cebrick, Unit Manager Grohowski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Cooper v. Nicholas et al
as 3:2024cv00757
Plaintiff:
Kaitlyn Cooper
Defendant:
Warden Nicholas, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, Mrs. Lampert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
