Cases 71 - 80 of 91
Lewis v. Ryan et al
as 2:2010cv00807
Plaintiff:
Carlton Justin Lewis
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Carson McWilliams, Unknown Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wayne Miller v. Carson McWilliams, et al
as 10-15393
Petitioner - Appellant:
WAYNE M. MILLER
Respondent - Appellee:
CARSON MCWILLIAMS, Florence Complex Warden and STATE OF ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jose Robles v. Carson McWilliam
as 09-73331
Petitioner:
JOSE JOSEPH ALLEN ROBLES
Respondent:
CARSON MCWILLIAMS, Warden and STATE OF ARIZONA
Williams v. Ryan et al
as 2:2009cv01727
Petitioner:
Ronald Dale Williams
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Carson McWilliams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Durrant v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2009cv01644
Plaintiff:
William G Durrant
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Charles L Ryan, Jane Doe Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rivadeneyra v. McWilliams et al
as 4:2009cv00428
Petitioner:
Manuel Mario Rivadeneyra
Respondent:
Carson McWilliams and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gregory Dickens, et al v. Janice Brewer, et al
as 09-16539
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY SCOTT DICKENS, DONALD EDWARD BEATY, CHARLES M. HEDLUND and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JANICE K. BREWER, CARSON MCWILLIAMS, Warden, ASPF, ROBERT STEWART, Warden, ASPCE and others
Gary Yoder v. USDC-AZP
as 09-71872
:
In re: GARY YODER
Petitioner:
GARY YODER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, PHOENIX
Real Party In Interest:
CARSON MCWILLIAMS, Warden
Medlock v. Ryan et al
as 3:2009cv08104
Petitioner:
Moses Medlock
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan, Carson McWilliams and Terry Goddard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
